
Supply Chain Due Diligence for Battery Materials is the systematic process of identifying and mitigating ESG risks (human rights, labour, and environmental) in the sourcing of lithium, cobalt, nickel, and graphite.
Under the EU Battery Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, companies placing batteries on the EU market must demonstrate responsible sourcing, risk management, and transparency across their upstream supply chains, in line with OECD Due Diligence Guidance.
The EU has officially postponed the most complex due diligence requirements to allow the industry and auditors (Notified Bodies) more time to prepare.
The first step is identifying all direct (Tier-1) and critical upstream (Tier-2) actors, such as refiners and processors. Under EU 2023/1542, you must document supplier names, locations, and the specific priority materials provided (lithium, cobalt, nickel, and graphite). Focus on identifying whether materials originate inside or outside the EU to establish a baseline for your traceability system.
You must determine the country of origin and specific mining/refining sites for each priority material to flag potential ESG risks. Since certain regions and extraction methods carry systemic risks (e.g., child labour or environmental damage), this step involves cross-referencing your supplier data against global risk indices. The goal is to gain full visibility into the highest-risk links so they can be addressed proportionately in your mitigation strategy.
Once materials and origins are known, assess risks related to:
The EU Battery Regulation aligns closely with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, which requires more than just identifying risks—it necessitates a comprehensive risk management plan.
The "Mitigate or Disengage" Rule: If a risk is identified, you are not always expected to cut ties immediately. The regulation encourages a "progressive" approach:
Important: Low-risk suppliers require lighter controls. High-risk links require enhanced scrutiny and a documented mitigation track record. This documentation is what auditors will look for to prove you are managing your chain actively, not just passively.
Ask suppliers to provide:
This is where many companies overcomplicate things. The expectation is reasonable assurance, not forensic audits across the entire chain.
Document what you receive, flag gaps, and record follow-up actions. This documentation becomes critical for both market surveillance checks and Battery Passport data inputs.
Supply chain due diligence is not a standalone obligation. It feeds directly into:
At a minimum, you should be able to demonstrate:
This turns due diligence from a one-off exercise into a living compliance process.
Supply chain due diligence is not just a top-down reporting exercise; it requires a bottom-up "early warning system." Under the EU Battery Regulation (Article 49) and OECD standards, companies must provide a way for stakeholders to voice concerns.
What this looks like in practice:
Pro Tip: You don't always need to build your own. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) can often join collaborative grievance mechanisms run by industry associations (like the RMI) to share the administrative load.
Risk assessment (Step 3) is useless without a Risk Management Plan. If you identify a high-risk link, you have three choices under the regulation:
Key Tip: Documenting how you tried to help a supplier improve is often more valuable to an auditor than simply firing them at the first sign of trouble.
While your internal team is currently undertaking the groundwork, the EU Battery Regulation requires that your due diligence scheme be verified by a third party (Notified Body) by August 18, 2027. This is not a "self-declaration" regime. Although the deadline was postponed from 2025, most major OEMs are already requiring this verification in 2026 contracts to ensure they are ready for the Battery Passport launch in early 2027.
Supply chain due diligence data underpins several Battery Passport elements, including:
While sensitive supplier and risk data is not publicly visible, authorities must be able to verify that due diligence has been performed consistently and credibly.
Supply chain due diligence does not sit in isolation. The data you collect on material origin, risk assessments, and mitigation actions becomes a foundational input for the Digital Battery Passport, particularly where regulators need to verify responsible sourcing claims. In practice, this information is surfaced through the battery’s QR code, with different data made available depending on the user’s role.
Public users see high-level sustainability indicators, while recyclers and authorities access more detailed compliance information. Understanding how due diligence data flows into public versus restricted Battery Passport disclosures is essential for building a compliant, IP-safe data strategy.
The due diligence obligations apply to any "economic operator" placing batteries on the EU market with a net annual turnover of more than €150 million (on a consolidated group basis). This threshold was updated in 2025 to focus specifically on large-scale operators.
While the EU Battery Regulation is already in force, the specific enforcement for supply chain due diligence has a critical milestone:
August 18, 2027: This is the revised deadline by which your due diligence systems must be fully operational and verified by a third party. However, most OEMs now require this data as part of their 2026 procurement contracts to prepare for the February 2027 Battery Passport launch.
Currently, the regulation focuses on four key "priority" materials:
A Notified Body is an independent auditing organisation authorised by EU member states to verify compliance. You can find a list of these accredited organisations on the EU’s NANDO database. It is your responsibility to contract one of these bodies to audit your due diligence policy and management systems.
The regulation expects "reasonable assurance." If a supplier is non-cooperative:
Source
EU Battery Regulation (EU) 2023/1542

